<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s New Algorithm to Rank Pages and Detect Spam: &#8220;PhraseRank&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm</link>
	<description>A comprehensive SEO and Web Marketing study</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:41:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Abraham Business Coach</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/comment-page-1#comment-218895</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Abraham Business Coach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm#comment-218895</guid>
		<description>I found this article to be very useful even though it was written years ago.  I love learning how Google gets it&#039;s information. Thanks for all the great info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this article to be very useful even though it was written years ago.  I love learning how Google gets it&#8217;s information. Thanks for all the great info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Compete When Your Niche is Overwhelmed With Spam &#124; ...:: aiogrup.net ::...</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/comment-page-1#comment-218260</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Compete When Your Niche is Overwhelmed With Spam &#124; ...:: aiogrup.net ::...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm#comment-218260</guid>
		<description>[...] website owners &amp;#1089&amp;#1072n rest positive th&amp;#1072t vital hunt engines &amp;#406&amp;#1110k&amp;#1077 Google w&amp;#1110&amp;#406&amp;#406 detect spamming sites &amp;#1110n time &amp;#1072n&amp;#1281 &amp;#1077&amp;#1110th&amp;#1077r diminution th&amp;#1077&amp;#1110r rankings &amp;#959r reject [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] website owners &amp;#1089&amp;#1072n rest positive th&amp;#1072t vital hunt engines &amp;#406&amp;#1110k&amp;#1077 Google w&amp;#1110&amp;#406&amp;#406 detect spamming sites &amp;#1110n time &amp;#1072n&amp;#1281 &amp;#1077&amp;#1110th&amp;#1077r diminution th&amp;#1077&amp;#1110r rankings &amp;#959r reject [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Cracking Down on Plagiarists?</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/comment-page-1#comment-203778</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Cracking Down on Plagiarists?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm#comment-203778</guid>
		<description>[...] other things in an effort to stop spam. That was also the year Google got a patent on a system to rank pages by phrase and they updated their spam reporting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other things in an effort to stop spam. That was also the year Google got a patent on a system to rank pages by phrase and they updated their spam reporting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/comment-page-1#comment-203474</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm#comment-203474</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information ........Very nice Article and i am new for this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information &#8230;&#8230;..Very nice Article and i am new for this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clearsite webdesign</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/comment-page-1#comment-150431</link>
		<dc:creator>Clearsite webdesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm#comment-150431</guid>
		<description>A bit more techy then the usual stuff i read, but very interesting. Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit more techy then the usual stuff i read, but very interesting. Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proper seo services</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/comment-page-1#comment-146148</link>
		<dc:creator>proper seo services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm#comment-146148</guid>
		<description>And whats up with this new google algorithm with relevance thing? I heard they&#039;re whining about load of spam in the search results hence this new tech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And whats up with this new google algorithm with relevance thing? I heard they&#8217;re whining about load of spam in the search results hence this new tech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texxs</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/comment-page-1#comment-140797</link>
		<dc:creator>texxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm#comment-140797</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure this ins&#039;t going to pan out.  It&#039;s too easy to check for spam with exsisitng technology.  Google just doesn&#039;t want to.  they make too much money from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure this ins&#8217;t going to pan out.  It&#8217;s too easy to check for spam with exsisitng technology.  Google just doesn&#8217;t want to.  they make too much money from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110958</link>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm#comment-110958</guid>
		<description>Hey Thanks for good info.

 It seems that you are talking about similar to Latent semantic analysis/algorithm. I would say google has already started to work on its LSA based technique just after Big Daddy Algorithm. 

 Although i believe, the most the relevancy with searched keyword is most important and is being considered by Google for its indexing purpose &amp; SERP Results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Thanks for good info.</p>
<p> It seems that you are talking about similar to Latent semantic analysis/algorithm. I would say google has already started to work on its LSA based technique just after Big Daddy Algorithm. </p>
<p> Although i believe, the most the relevancy with searched keyword is most important and is being considered by Google for its indexing purpose &amp; SERP Results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affan Laghari</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/comment-page-1#comment-108961</link>
		<dc:creator>Affan Laghari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm#comment-108961</guid>
		<description>Nice article though I am a bit late. But I will put my 2 cents:

As far as the claim that the webmaster will find it difficult to manipulate his own page to the best of the system, I think black hat SEOs are way ahead than we realize. I mean suppose they want to optimize the webpage text of an MFA site for the keyword &quot;seo research&quot;. 

So they will just see what documents are ranking for this keyword like the top 20 results. And by analyzing their text, they can get some hints as to what seems to be the normal/usual keyword density of the actual phrase and the related phrases in all these documents. Of course it will be difficult to analyze that in the beginning and for solely one phrase. But if you do the same procedure for 100 phrases and you analyze around 2000 webpages for that, you will get a fair understanding of what Google is doing.

But what I mean is that it will be easier to optimize the webpage itself. However, the real difficulty will be in optimizing the linking pages. I mean optimizing a page that links to you with the optimized anchor text (actual phrase or related phrase) will be the real tough thing.

Firstly, it&#039;s way too difficult to analyze the linking pages. I mean even though I can retrieve the top 30 results for the keyword &quot;SEO research&quot;, it&#039;s not easy to get my hands on the humdred thousand documents which are linking to these documents and passing optimal link juice. 
So far as I know, Yahoo Site explorer is the most comprehensive database that tells you how many pages are linking. But out of these, Google discounts a large number such as nofollowed or infamous directories. So the real toughness would come when the Phraserank will be combined the current Pagerank and also the Trustrank. 
But that&#039;s my opinion of course which can be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article though I am a bit late. But I will put my 2 cents:</p>
<p>As far as the claim that the webmaster will find it difficult to manipulate his own page to the best of the system, I think black hat SEOs are way ahead than we realize. I mean suppose they want to optimize the webpage text of an MFA site for the keyword &#8220;seo research&#8221;. </p>
<p>So they will just see what documents are ranking for this keyword like the top 20 results. And by analyzing their text, they can get some hints as to what seems to be the normal/usual keyword density of the actual phrase and the related phrases in all these documents. Of course it will be difficult to analyze that in the beginning and for solely one phrase. But if you do the same procedure for 100 phrases and you analyze around 2000 webpages for that, you will get a fair understanding of what Google is doing.</p>
<p>But what I mean is that it will be easier to optimize the webpage itself. However, the real difficulty will be in optimizing the linking pages. I mean optimizing a page that links to you with the optimized anchor text (actual phrase or related phrase) will be the real tough thing.</p>
<p>Firstly, it&#8217;s way too difficult to analyze the linking pages. I mean even though I can retrieve the top 30 results for the keyword &#8220;SEO research&#8221;, it&#8217;s not easy to get my hands on the humdred thousand documents which are linking to these documents and passing optimal link juice.<br />
So far as I know, Yahoo Site explorer is the most comprehensive database that tells you how many pages are linking. But out of these, Google discounts a large number such as nofollowed or infamous directories. So the real toughness would come when the Phraserank will be combined the current Pagerank and also the Trustrank.<br />
But that&#8217;s my opinion of course which can be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to reach number one in Search - EXPERTS ADVICE FORUM</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm/comment-page-1#comment-108688</link>
		<dc:creator>How to reach number one in Search - EXPERTS ADVICE FORUM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/googles-new-algorithm-to-rank-pages-and-detect-spam-phrase-rank.htm#comment-108688</guid>
		<description>[...] offering free keyword density checks are: http://www.virtualpromote.com/tools/keyword_analyzer/  Google’s New Algorithm to Rank Pages and Detect Spam: “PhraseRank”?  In order to check the keyword density of a text document to be used in the site, the number of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] offering free keyword density checks are: <a href="http://www.virtualpromote.com/tools/keyword_analyzer/" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualpromote.com/tools/keyword_analyzer/</a>  Google’s New Algorithm to Rank Pages and Detect Spam: “PhraseRank”?  In order to check the keyword density of a text document to be used in the site, the number of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

