SEO Articles
Paid Search Marketing Vs. Natural Search Promotion
September 13th, 2006Paid Search Marketing
Many web marketers see paid search marketing as the fastest way to bring traffic to their online shops. At the first glance the pay-per-click scheme looks easy: you bid on a keyword, higher bids get higher positions (Overture), and web users see your listing among the top results for your target keyword. You don’t have to invest into search engine optimization and link building; you pay for your visitors and hope to quickly get targeted traffic. But did you notice that more and more often you have to raise bids above the threshold of profitability in order to put your listings to the top of paid search results? With money you spend for PPC exceeding your revenues is it worth to do online business at all? Well, it is time to seriously consider promoting your website in natural (organic) search results.
No matter what your niche is, targeting one- or two-word search terms is difficult and ineffective. Not just you have to compete with big established websites, generic terms themselves have low conversion rates. Long tail keywords however are less popular, less competitive and are less searched, but when used collectively they are able to drive a lot of quality traffic to your website which can be quite easily converted into sales. People looking for 4 or 5 keyword phrases are more likely to become a buyer. Generic keywords indicate that a person is probably doing a research without an intention to buy something immediately (so-called “early stage researcher”).
Facts about Natural and Paid Search
1. Natural Search pulls 250% more traffic than the paid search.
Take a look at the picture below. This is a hit map, it tracks eye and click activity on a web page. What you see is a regular Google search results page. The brighter colors represent areas where the majority of web users’ eyes and clicks go when they get to this page. This map is produced by an infrared camera that tracks every eye movement and click that a surfer makes. This study was done with about four hundred people but actually their behavioral patterns are so similar that eight surfers are enough to produce an analogous image.
Fig. 1. Google SEPR hit-map. Click to see the enlarged version. Source: EyeTools.com
On the hit map colors represent eye hit distribution, purple crosses (with a number of a tested subject) show where users click. Red color indicates the hottest spot on the page where the most of eye hits are made (click here to see the hit map explained).You can see that the first listing gets the biggest portion on the clicks, second receive less, and there are also some for the third listing. You can also see that many people scroll the page to the bottom and click the 8th, 9th and 10th listings too although the number of clicks in this area can be hundreds time less than in the top left area. The brighter areas form so-called “Golden Triangle†and you can clearly see than most of the people spend their time looking through the natural search results.
Now take a look at the right side of the page. The number of eye hits is far less even than at the bottom of the page. So being number 9 or 10 in the Google natural search results will bring you nearly the same number of clicks as from the first position in the paid search results, and far more than from the second, third and lower sponsored listings.
2. Paid Search Lives Off Natural Search
AdWords, as well as any other PPC program, is a parasitic system – it uses natural search to make money from the paid listings. Google performs millions searches every day and most of them are from people who don’t even look at the paid results. You probably remember the time when Ask.com was experimenting with paid search? Ask.com used to deliver paid listings only above the page-fold so that users had to scroll down to get to natural results. It had seriously damaged the user experience, and surfers simply stopped using it. Google is not going to repeat this mistake. Its initial popularity has grown from the quality of search results, and therefore paid listings have to be placed in areas where they don’t disturb users – on the right side.
So the eye-hit map proves quite clearly – web users search organic results first (even if they have to scroll down!) and only after that and not always look through the paid search listings.
Let’s visit Google and search for “best plasma tvâ€. In the SERP (screenshot) you can see some listings like “consumer reviews on plasma TVâ€, “plasma TV buying guideâ€, “compare plasma TV prices†and so on. These are information based websites. Google search algorithms return information on plasma TV, and the results are contextually accurate. If you take a look at the paid search listings you will notice that some of them are trying to imitate the listings in the natural results by using the dynamic keyword-insertion, which adds keywords from the query into link text and listing body.
Bottom line is: web users are conditioned to free search without ads. This is a fact that people searching for a product review or a particular model are looking for information before making a buying decision. So when a person looks at a SERP, the first positions in natural search – even if there are paid listing above it – is where clicks are made. This is proven by eye tracking studies that show that 63% of top organic listings will get a click.
3. Long Tail Search Keywords Convert The Best.
Obviously one multiple-keyword phrase brings much less traffic then a generic one-word search term. But you can be sure that if someone searches for a “laptopâ€, he is still researching. On the contrary if a person searches for a “Sony Vaio laptop under $1000†– he is a hot prospect. What is equally important – long tail search terms are easier to rank for. Take a look at few examples. Let’s go to MSN.com (12.8% search share in the U.S.) and search for “affordable custom kitchen cabinets†(screenshot). The “Golden Triangle†applies also to MSN SEPRs as well as to ANY other web page – the first area people look at is top-left then middle-left. Let’s click on the third listing, which possibly gets quite a lot of traffic. What do you see? EuroKitchenBathCabinets.com- a pretty looking website. And now take a look at its PageRank (if you have Google toolbar installed in your browser). PageRank equals 2! Well, obviously the author of this page didn’t have to do much work to get into number 3 position in MSN. If you spent just a week for link building you will get PR2 quite easily after the next Google PageRank update. Of course PageRank and MSN ranking are not directly connected. But PR allows us to estimate how big the popularity of a page is, and MSN also uses page popularity to assign ranks.
Now lets search for “sofa slip covers cheap” (screenshot). Take a look at the second position: http://www.homenexotic.com/sofa-covers.htm. This is an AdSense website – a site which makes money from AdSense advertising program. Its PageRank is zero! This page has almost no popularity and yet it is in MSN top ten! You see the AdSense block, some content, links to related articles. This page is probably auto-generated, so it takes almost no effort to maintain it.
(By the way, if you still don’t use AdSense - you are probably missing a source of substantial income. Do go and open an AdSense account now: It takes almost no time, and can bring you few extra hundreds $$).
Naturally you wouldn’t see sites like these in the results for one- or two-word search terms. Generic terms are too competitive, there too many high-quality websites struggling to rank higher for them. But with long-tail search phrases – no problem, even mediocre pages get substantial traffic.
4. Natural Search Visitors Convert Nearly 30% Higher Than Paid Search.
There are many merchant websites utilizing special conversion tracking systems that enable them to see what the conversion rates are for different groups of visitors. And according to the statistics supplied by these systems visitors from natural search results convert 30% more frequently than paid search visitors. If your website is marginally profitable from the paid search traffic you are going to do even better with natural search visitors. So for every $1000 of revenue you will get $1300. And that is not the whole picture: don’t forget that natural search brings you 2.5 times more visitors than PPC. You will see a 325% increase in revenue once you get the free traffic from the natural search results. What’s more, unlike paid search, this traffic is free.
Another catch – to increase chances of a user clicking a paid search ad some people open two accounts to show two listings both leading to the same landing page. Not just promoting them to the top in paid results is difficult, but also users might click both listings and make you pay twice for the same visitor! Natural search results also sometimes show two listings for one site: the front page and one of the second-tier pages, if they both rank equally well for a specific search term (see first and second positions on this screenshot). See how such a “double†listing is reflected in the eye-hit map.
Fig.2 Hit map for a Google SERP double listing. Click to see an enlarged version. Source: EyeTools.com
Look how many people scan the entire long headline of the double listing! Even the one above it doesn’t get as much of the eye activity. Obviously chances of a user clicking this link are higher than any other one. Eye tracking study reports 70% of clicking chance for double listings – 70% of al the clicks that happen on a SERP! And natural search is the only way to get such a listing.
Let’s examine another evidence. Look at a table showing the percentage of clicks made in organic search results, featured ads, paid listings on top of the search results and in the side bar. Users are grouped according to their educational level. Among all the groups only high-school students tend to click more on the paid listings than on the organic results. So if your targeted audience is high-school kids – PPC is for you. But note – high-school students do not have much of a buying power, what they can spend is their allowance and lunch money. Therefore in most cases you are better off with clicks from the more educated groups – and they love organic search results.
| Which area on a SERP would you typically look at first |
Level of education
|
|||||
| Some high shool | High school diploma or equivalent | College diploma | University degree | Masters degree | Doctoral degree | |
| alt. org. and features | 0 | 18.75% | 17.56% | 20.22% | 20.25% | 35.00% |
| organic results | 33.33% | 0 | 64.12% | 64.62% | 66.87% | 45.00% |
| sidebar paid | 0 | 53.13% | 4.58% | 4.58% | 1.84% | 0 |
| top portion paid | 66.67% | 28.13% | 13.74% | 13.74% | 11.04% | 20.00% |
Table 1. Level of education and SERP usage patterns. Source: ConvertLinks.com
To Sum Up
- 1. For many websites more than half of traffic comes with long tail keywords than from shorter one-two keyword phrases. For some recently created sites almost all traffic is supplied by long tail keywords.
- Targeting long tail keyword phrases will bring more revenue since they represent a bigger part of your traffic.
- You will make more sales with long tail keywords because they have a higher conversion ratio.
- It doesn’t take much effort to rank well for long tail keywords in natural search results.
- You will get more income from visitors coming from natural search results because they convert better than those arriving to your website via paid listings.
- Having traffic from the long tail keywords in natural search results saves you your PPC campaign money.
I am not telling you to stop using paid search marketing immediately. Pay per click is just one of many options to promote a site. Unfortunately it is not the one suitable for new sites. Unless your purpose is to get a quick exposure and you do not care about making any profits – paid search marketing may work well. But if you are trying to make money from a fresh site with paid listings – you’d better be sure about the conversion ratio of your landing pages and target audience. And the best way to figure out these ratios is first trying to promote your pages to the natural search results with long tail keywords.
Sources:
1. ConvertLinks.com. Video 1. Available at: http://www.convertlinks.com/video1.php?10000 Downloaded on 12.09.06
2. EyeTools.com. “Eyetools, Enquiro, and Did-it uncover Search’s Golden Triangle”. Available at: http://www.eyetools.com/inpage/research_google_eyetracking_heatmap.htm
Did you like it? Was it useful? Bookmark or share this post:
19 Responses to “Paid Search Marketing Vs. Natural Search Promotion”





Digg This!
Technorati
Del.icio.us
Furl
Blinklist
Ma.gnolia
Yahoo! My Web


September 14th, 2006 at 10:35 pm
[...] Many web marketers see paid search marketing as the fastest way to bring traffic to their online shops. At the first glance the pay-per-click scheme looks easy: you bid on a keyword, higher bids get higher positions (Overture), and web users see your listing among the top results for your target keyword. You don’t have to invest into search engine optimization and link building; you pay for your visitors and hope to quickly get targeted traffic. But did you notice that more and more often you have to raise bids above the threshold of profitability in order to put your listings to the top of paid search results? With money you spend for PPC exceeding your revenues is it worth to do online business at all? Well, it is time to seriously consider promoting your website in natural (organic) search results. [...]
September 22nd, 2006 at 3:02 pm
Hello,
You have a nofollow link pointing back to your article on my site. “Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) Review » Blog Archive » Is Promotion with Long Tail Keywords More Effective Than Paid Search Marketing? Says:”
As I have left all your links intact without blocking them, it is courtesy to not to block this link from being picked up by the search engines. After all I am giving your site SEO benefits, so if you could do the same it would be appreciated.
Regards,
Andrew
September 22nd, 2006 at 3:24 pm
Andrew,
The comment with the blocked link is a pingback - a notification from the WordPress engine that somebody links to my article. WordPress automatically inserts rel=”nofollow” into links within pingbacks since these are automated comments and should not influence link popularity. I tried to find an option to disable ‘nofollow’ insertion but so far didn’t succeed. Do you know how to do it?
September 22nd, 2006 at 5:03 pm
It appears that WordPress blocks links not just in pingback but in any comments. The purpose is obvious - to battle the spamming blogs with links in comments. Otherwise anyone could get a PR6 link just by commenting a PR6 blog
December 19th, 2006 at 6:01 pm
[...] More details on the comparison between natural and PPC in this blog post. [...]
December 19th, 2006 at 6:05 pm
[...] More details on the comparison between natural and PPC in this blog post. [...]
February 2nd, 2007 at 11:56 am
WOW! Great article. Wish I would have read this article months ago. My site has been up only 1 month and my Adwords campaign was looking more like a very nice car payment. Time to change my marketing gears a bit.
Thanks for the article, it\’s great how you are succinct with all your content.
http://www.dogadoptionguide.com
February 2nd, 2007 at 3:14 pm
[...] Below is a fascinating breakdown of paid search engine optimization vs. natural search engine optimization - and the superiority of the latter, which is the hallmark of iScribe, Limited. Credit for this extensive research goes to seoresearcher.com - the numbers do not lie. [...]
April 25th, 2007 at 1:19 pm
I realize that PPC campaigns are not as great as organic searches, but doesn’t it help to use them in conjunction? My companies website just got released, since the age of our website is very new and that is something the algorithm uses to determine page rank, I don’t think we would be found AT ALL if we were not doing PPC to initially get some traffic.
http://www.myigetit.com
June 12th, 2007 at 9:50 pm
Great article.
I’d like to send it around to a few friends whom I think could benefit. Would like to have the writing tightened up a bit (missing words, wrong words, extra words, etc.)
July 22nd, 2007 at 5:18 am
[...] Paid Search Marketing Vs. Natural Search PromotionFor some recently created sites almost all traffic is supplied by long tail keywords. Targeting long tail keyword phrases will bring more revenue since they represent a bigger part of your [...]
July 31st, 2007 at 1:01 pm
Over the years I’ve worked on literally hundreds of paid and organic search campaigns and I can tell you that it isn’t always true that organic search provides more traffic or converts better than paid search traffic. It really depends on the query, ad creative and nature of your business. Organic is a cheaper way to go, though not free if you consider the cost of making changes to the site, hiring consultants, etc. I think you need to do both organic and paid in order to be optimally effective, and you need to do both well.
October 15th, 2007 at 10:41 am
Great and excellent article is really helpful. Thanks again.
November 12th, 2007 at 10:57 am
Great writing and thinking. I just Twittered a link to this post. All web users should understand a little at least about such issues.
My name at Twitter is vaspers.
April 30th, 2008 at 6:59 am
The third point that was mentioned in the “To Sum Up” was very much true in our case. I am wondering if there are any reports with eye-hit maps for different industries grouped into one place?
Great report. Thanks for the valuable info.
Collagist
July 14th, 2008 at 7:21 am
thsnks for such a wonderful info…
this will help me to increase brand awarness of our real estate website…
thanks a lot..
July 24th, 2008 at 5:19 pm
Hi,
I agree with you 100% that Natural Listings are more lucrative than Paid Search and yes, Paid Search does seem to be an immediate call for traffic and to get visitors. However, I think Paid Search and Natural Listings go hand in hand. Natural Listings are the best but in the long run can take a while plus any significant changes to the website can also make you loose your ranks. Paid Search on the other hand gives you full control over your visibility online, where you land the users, and how you analyze the conversion to make your campaigns and landing pages better. At the end of the day, it all depends on your online budget.
July 24th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
Just a follow up on the previous post, I also believe if your website has been search optimized to be liked by search engines, it pays off in your paid search campaigns as well with a better Quality Score and a lower Cost Per Click.
Lastly, I am a paid search professional and in my experience, when I talk to people about what I do, more than half of them don’t even know what the sponsored search links are and are scared to click on them because they fear them to be spam - which is why they lean more towards the natural listings. Unfortunately, majority of the population does not even know about the existence of CPC Advertising and hence don’t know the relevance of it and the Sponsored Search ads.
August 15th, 2008 at 9:17 am
[...] you might be sat there thinking its not so bad, but if we look at some stats we can see that Google users tend to click on natural search results a whopping 72.3% more than they [...]