<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popularity Ranking Faults</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoresearcher.com/popularity-ranking-faults.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/popularity-ranking-faults.htm</link>
	<description>A comprehensive SEO and Web Marketing study</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Link Popularity Building Strategies and Tips &#171; Link Building Strategies</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/popularity-ranking-faults.htm/comment-page-1#comment-14129</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Popularity Building Strategies and Tips &#171; Link Building Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 13:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/blog/?p=4#comment-14129</guid>
		<description>[...] Thus, links rule the Internet. Once a routine task of a webmaster, link building has emerged itself into a full scale industry with millions of dollars in turnover. Ranking algorithms perceive links as a proxy for a human judgment, or a userâ€™s positive endorsement of a page. The idea is as follows: a user discovers a page, likes its content, links to the page, and the page gets higher ranking. This is the so-called â€˜natural wayâ€™ of acquiring links. The natural way of acquiring link works too slow and can be pretty unfair. New pages on big and established websites are far more likely to be discovered by web users, and these pages will get the biggest part of the new links (like 90%); while new pages on fresh sites will get trinkets. This is a serious defect of the link ranking system which is discussed more in details in my article Popularity Ranking Faults. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thus, links rule the Internet. Once a routine task of a webmaster, link building has emerged itself into a full scale industry with millions of dollars in turnover. Ranking algorithms perceive links as a proxy for a human judgment, or a userâ€™s positive endorsement of a page. The idea is as follows: a user discovers a page, likes its content, links to the page, and the page gets higher ranking. This is the so-called â€˜natural wayâ€™ of acquiring links. The natural way of acquiring link works too slow and can be pretty unfair. New pages on big and established websites are far more likely to be discovered by web users, and these pages will get the biggest part of the new links (like 90%); while new pages on fresh sites will get trinkets. This is a serious defect of the link ranking system which is discussed more in details in my article Popularity Ranking Faults. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etudes Web et rÃ©fÃ©rencement / Les limites du positionnement par calcul de popularitÃ©</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/popularity-ranking-faults.htm/comment-page-1#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Etudes Web et rÃ©fÃ©rencement / Les limites du positionnement par calcul de popularitÃ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/blog/?p=4#comment-122</guid>
		<description>[...] Popularity Ranking Faults PubliÃ© le 01/07/2006 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Popularity Ranking Faults PubliÃ© le 01/07/2006 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Marketing Research &#187; Link Popularity Building Strategies and Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/popularity-ranking-faults.htm/comment-page-1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Marketing Research &#187; Link Popularity Building Strategies and Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/blog/?p=4#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] Thus, links rule the Internet. Once a routine task of a webmaster, link building has emerged itself into a full scale industry with millions of dollars in turnover. Ranking algorithms perceive links as a proxy for a human judgment, or a userâ€™s positive endorsement of a page. The idea is as follows: a user discovers a page, likes its content, links to the page, and the page gets higher ranking. This is the so-called â€˜natural wayâ€™ of acquiring links. The natural way of acquiring link works is too slow and can be pretty unfair. New pages on big and established websites are far more likely to be discovered by web users, and these pages will get the major part of the new links (like 90%); while new pages on fresh sites will get trinkets. This is a serious defect of the link ranking system which is discussed more in details in my article Popularity Ranking Faults. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thus, links rule the Internet. Once a routine task of a webmaster, link building has emerged itself into a full scale industry with millions of dollars in turnover. Ranking algorithms perceive links as a proxy for a human judgment, or a userâ€™s positive endorsement of a page. The idea is as follows: a user discovers a page, likes its content, links to the page, and the page gets higher ranking. This is the so-called â€˜natural wayâ€™ of acquiring links. The natural way of acquiring link works is too slow and can be pretty unfair. New pages on big and established websites are far more likely to be discovered by web users, and these pages will get the major part of the new links (like 90%); while new pages on fresh sites will get trinkets. This is a serious defect of the link ranking system which is discussed more in details in my article Popularity Ranking Faults. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.seoresearcher.com/popularity-ranking-faults.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoresearcher.com/blog/?p=4#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Great post!   Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!   Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
